Let’s work together to improve healthcare for all.



Join us.




WHEREVER YOU LIVE, Call these Senators and ask them to
vote no on proceeding with health care bill:  

Senator Shelley Moore Capito – 202-224-6244 – West Virginia – @SenCapito 

Senator Lisa Murkowski – 202-224-3004 – Alaska – @lisamurkowski

Senator Susan Collins – 202-224-5941 – Maine– @SenatorCollins

Signatory Letter

[to address to all Republican Senators]

If you are willing to be a signatory to this letter, please email me and let me know your city, state and preferably contact information. We are looking for variety and especially people in Ohio, Nevada, Alaska, West Virginia, Arizona, Arkansas, Maine, Tennessee, Colorado, Nebraska. Everywhere, really.

Dear Senator __________________,

Disability Voters is a national organization of people with disabilities, family members, friends, disability professionals, and others for whom candidates’ stances on disability rights and interests are an important determinant of political decisions.  

We will be rating candidates based on votes important to people with disabilities. Our members have been active in elections, but recent events have made clear that we need to do much more. We will be making endorsements and contributions, and mobilizing volunteers, in 2018 House and Senate races. We are not affiliated with any political party, and hope that support for people with disabilities will return as soon as possible to being a bipartisan commitment.

We are writing to let you know that your vote with respect to AHCA/BCRA will be a key determinant in our decisions about involvement in your state.

The reasons are obvious:
1) The House bill would devastate the Medicaid programs on which many people with disabilities rely for independence, quality of life, and in many cases survival. The Senate bill would do so a little more slowly, but even more deeply.

2) The Republican proposals would pit people with disabilities against children, seniors, low-wage workers, and others who are likely to become unnecessarily disabled if preventive, rehabilitative and early intervention services are removed.

3) People need insurance to protect themselves and their family members from events they deem unlikely. Thousands of children with autism have benefitted from insurance-funded intensive early intervention services because the Affordable Care Act requires health plans to cover such services.  Few people anticipate developmental disabilities, costly injuries, or grave illnesses, or could afford assurance that would cover the care they warrant in the dual market the Cruz proposal — sadly adopted by Senate Republicans — would create.

4) Proposed reductions in health insurance would force parents of children with disabilities and adults with disabilities to spend their lives scrambling, fighting and begging—for charity medical care, gifted pharmaceuticals, scarce public education dollars, etc. Not only are the outcomes of such struggles uncertain, but that is no way to live.

We will be watching your vote during the coming weeks. We hope that you will work across party lines to protect people with disabilities, and people at risk of disabling conditions.

Sincerely, ____________________

Go Local

Start a Disability Voters chapter in your state and/or Congressional District.
Contact us with a statement of interest and some information about your interests and experience.

Call Your Congress

Download these helpful apps to your phone to look up legislators, get updates on bills and more:  CallToActionCapitolCallCongress and Starlight Congress:

Click here for an article about many ways to contact politicians; confirming the general theory that the more effort and personalization are involved, the more attention contacts get (visits are better than phone calls are better than emails, personalized emails are better than mass emails, and everything except online petitions help).

Get involved

How can people affected by disabilities protect ourselves now and become a real force in US politics?

A president has entered office who mocks people with disabilities, has been repeatedly sued for violating civil rights laws protecting people with disabilities and others, and goes on and on about “genes,” being “smart,” and “genius.” Even more serious, the Republican party has been given nearly complete control over the national government and that of many states. This is not the Republican Party as we have known it under presidents like Eisenhower, Nixon and the Bushes. It is a Republican Party which has been radicalized around a platform of dismantling the social safety net for people with disabilities, seniors and others. It has won power over the executive branch and both houses of Congress, and will soon control the Supreme Court as well. Public opinion has changed: The backlash against “government” and groups that are perceived as “other,” as scary, and as “takers” very much includes people with disabilities. Not only are many people with disabilities also members of other groups that are under attack, but even those who aren’t depend politically on alliances in support of government policies that help people and government systems that have the leadership, vision, funding, and accountability it takes to make them work.

This website will have six main sections:

1) Political Institutions deals with elections and appointments – political contests we can hope to affect. It contains Action Items.
2) Issues deals with specific issue areas such as education and health care. It contains Action Items.
3) Calendar contains events Disability Voters is planning.
4) Resources contains articles and links to material that casts light on how we have gotten to this point and where we should go from here.
5) Playlist contains music and culture.
6) Election 2016 is the website of Disability Advocates 2016, the predecessor to Disability Voters.

Why another organization – Disability Voters?

People with disabilities and their supporters need to be a powerful presence in both parties, not a group that can be bought off cheaply with symbols. Most people with disabilities and family members stay in the same party as their families of origin (like most other people). Candidates rarely bother to try to change that. We need to become voters who “swing,” evaluating our interests and supporting candidates who support us. Information about where candidates stand on disability issues has been available but scattered and difficult to find. Disability organizations have pressed candidates to reveal their views and collected information about their records, but are generally non- or bipartisan as a result of strategy, conviction, internal differences of opinion, reliance on government funding, and/or maintaining nonprofit status for tax reasons. We intend to bring together critical disability-related information — not just what candidates say, but what they do.

Who are we?

We are people who have disabilities, friends and relatives of people with disabilities, and professionals who work with people with disabilities. We think that at this moment, people with disabilities face acute threats from a new Republican majority that is not conservative but radical and reactionary. Bipartisan support for people with disabilities is a precious tradition, and continues to occur sometimes, for example with autism insurance reform in some states. Trump’s insults to people with disabilities have been the most striking departure from that tradition, but even typical Republicans such as Vice-President Mike Pence, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have alarming positions. They do not insult people with disabilities, but propose policies which would be devastating for our community. Trump is attempting to fill the Executive Branch with appointees whose positions on disability issues would be disastrous — as they say in Washington, personnel is policy. We need to block these appointments. 

There will be some elections in 2017 and many more in 2018 and 2020. We need to select and elect candidates who respect the rights of people with disabilities and will work to meet their needs. That is a long-term process and we need to start now gathering people and enough money to make our voices heard.



Disability Voters is an activist group that aims to improve election outcomes for people with disabilities and their families and supporters. It was started in 2016 based on concern about the possible election of Donald Trump and the risk that Republicans would win power to reverse or weaken Medicaid, Medicare, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and state and local protections that are vital for people with disabilities and their families, and in many cases for broader populations as well.

Disability Voters is organizing locally and nationally to help people with disabilities and their allies achieve the political representation that our numbers warrant. We will soon register a Political Action Committee with the Federal Election Commission so that we can raise money to support and oppose candidates. We don’t want to plead with hostile politicians except when absolutely necessary; rather, we want to be selecting and electing politicians who understand that disability is a natural part of the human condition and that we have rights in addition to needs. We don’t want to be bound by rules that keep charitable tax-exempt organizations from endorsing candidates. We don’t want to be a piece of some individual candidate’s campaign, at risk of disappearing when the election is over. We don’t want to be tied to a single party, since in the not so distant past, disability issues were bipartisan, and we hope that in the long term they will be once again.


Disability Voters includes people who can vote, people who cannot yet vote but hope to at some point, and anyone who understands that, in our system, elections are vital. Sitting out elections with a plan to try to work with and/or protest against whoever wins is not enough. There is strength in numbers, enthusiasm, and geographic distribution. Membership in Disability Voters is free; it involves giving us your email address and agreeing to consider requests for action.


• A person with a disability
• Linked to someone with a disability as a family member, friend or professional
• Someone reasonable enough to see that you or someone you care about may eventually become a person with a disability
• A political ally of people with disabilities who realizes that the social safety net — providing food, shelter, health care, and a livable, safe environment even for people who can’t pay — matters for us all


Not surprisingly, given frustration related to unmet needs, up to this point people with disabilities have been evenly distributed along the left-right political continuum based on longstanding family and personal loyalties. Politicians can reasonably assume that nothing they do for or to our community really affects election outcomes. Candidates and officeholders assume that, when it comes to our community, Democrats and Democratic leaning Independents will vote Democratic, and Republicans and Republican-leaning Independents will vote Republican. The 2016 election undoubtedly reinforced that perception: the disability vote broke down like the general population even though Trump had been sued for violating the rights of people with disabilities and insulted them on the campaign trail, while Clinton pointed to her history and plans relating to disability advocacy. We don’t want to be tied totally to one party, with nowhere to go if our interests are neglected, but it is even worse for us to be seen as immovable and inert. That is where the disability vote is now.

We need to change that.


The goal of Disability Voters is to turn the massive numbers of people affected by disability policy in the US into a coherent, somewhat unified voting bloc that politicians will need to pay attention to. We share these views:
• Early intervention services need to be based on efficacy research, not on conventional service levels or assumptions that infants and toddlers with disabilities need to be segregated from typically developing peers.
• Special education for students from age 3 to the age of transition (typically 21) needs to enable skill development and curricular access and it needs to be as inclusive as possible.
• Health care geared to physical and mental health needs must be a right, even for people with conditions that are expensive and/or “preexisting.”
• Genetic and prenatal counseling need to be fully voluntary, and if accessed need to be provided by professionals who understand the rights and opportunities available to people with disabilities. No one should terminate a pregnancy based on false or discriminatory stereotypes about the lives of people with disabilities, or because needed supports are not available for people with disabilities.
• Environmental protections, workplace safety and health standards, and substance abuse treatment need to be in place to minimize preventable disabilities.
• Family and direct support provider contributions need to be honored financially and otherwise.
• Employment needs to be fostered, workers’ rights need to be protected, and individualized entrepreneurial supports need to be available. 
• Adults with disabilities need to be able to live with family or other companions and caregivers whom they choose, or independently to the extent feasible if that is their preference.
• Income maintenance and housing programs for individuals with disabilities should not assume that poverty and segregation are “natural” states.
• Technologies that make it possible for people with disabilities to communicate, plan and live in ways that were unimaginable a generation ago need to be funded and available, and training needs to be provided for all concerned.
• People with disabilities need to be empowered to save money, develop skills, and plan for their futures, without losing access to critical supports.
• Access to disability-related rights and services should be available in all parts of our country, including sparsely populated areas, and federal oversight needs to be meaningful and responsive.

These principles may seem basic, but so far none have been realized. Both major US political parties have fallen short. Disability Voters aims to improve our options in elections by pushing all parties and candidates to do better, and to help voters, volunteers and donors identify and elect those candidates who are most helpful, or least harmful, from a disability perspective.